Please log in with your Liberal ID.
Your Liberal Extranet credentials can be used.
Have an Extranet Account?Login here!.
One step! Just fill these fields in.
Your password was changed successfully.
Please check your email for a link to finish the account creation process.
You must click that link to be able to comment.
The website was not able to match you to your membership.
If you have just filled in your renewal or membership application form please wait 2-5 business days while your Provincial-Territorial Association processes your application.
If after waiting 5 business days you are still having troubles or you are a current member, please fill out this form and we will assist you shortly.
Thank you for activating your account. We have automatically logged you in.
Sorry, this activation link does not work. Your account may already be activated. Please try to login or contact firstname.lastname@example.org for assistance.>
Please log in with your Liberal ID.
Your Liberal Extranet credentials can be used.
Thank you for visiting my website. I hope you can take a moment to look around, learn more about me and the work I am doing for the people of St-Laurent-Cartierville. I look forward to listening to your concerns and suggestions on how to build a better Canada — a Canada that leads the world by example.
On March 26, 2015, as CBC/Radio-Canada announced the loss of 244 jobs, affecting many local stations, I asked the government to acknowledge the link between these job cuts and the ideological budget reductions it has imposed on the public broadcaster.
Please find attached this exchange, in both official languages. As always, I will be very pleased to read any comments you might have.
Enjoy your read!
* * *
Mr. Speaker, we have learned that many more jobs at the CBC are being cut and that this round will affect local stations. Will the minister finally admit that this recurrent downsizing is due to the Conservatives’ cuts? Since 2006, they have slashed $227 million, in 2014 dollars, which is about one-fifth of the CBC’s budget.
Will the minister at least try to convince her government to restore that money in the next budget? We hope so.
Mr. Speaker, as the member knows, the CBC is responsible for its own operations. It is up to the CBC to provide programming that Canadians actually want to watch and listen to in both of our official languages.
Our government provides, on a yearly basis, the CBC with very significant funds. Let us be clear that these changes, and the member is probably aware of this, are part of the CBC’s restructuring and strategic plan, which it began implementation of in 2014.
On March 23, 2015 in the House of Commons, as Liberal Critic for Canadian Heritage, I voiced my support for a proposed inclusive National Day to commemorate the Boat People saga and all that Canada owes its Vietnamese community’s vitality.
Please find my speech below. As always, I will be very pleased to read any comments you might have.
Enjoy your read!
41st PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION
EDITED HANSARD • NUMBER 187
Monday, March 23, 2015
PRIVATE MEMBERS’ BUSINESS
Journey to Freedom Day Act
Mr. Speaker, as the Liberal critic for Canadian heritage, I would like to explain to the House why I will be supporting Bill S-219, An Act respecting a national day of commemoration of the exodus of Vietnamese refugees and their acceptance in Canada after the fall of Saigon and the end of the Vietnam War, or the Journey to Freedom Day Act.
I would also like to explain why I am insisting that the government allow this bill to be extensively and thoroughly reviewed by the appropriate parliamentary committee. Everyone must have an opportunity to freely express their opinions, unlike what happened in the Senate.
Bill S-219 would designate April 30 as the Journey to Freedom Day and would commemorate Vietnamese refugees and their exodus to Canada. This day would not be a legal holiday or a day off. However, it would provide an opportunity to celebrate how lucky Canada is to have such a vibrant Vietnamese community. As the Liberal leader and member for Papineau always says, Canada’s diversity is what makes our country strong. Vietnamese Canadians are a good example of that.
A number of my constituents of Vietnamese origin have shared a different perspective. They see this day as an opportunity to thank Canada for welcoming them with open arms and for giving them a chance at a new life. The Vietnamese are known for their generosity and modesty.
If Canada tells them that it wants to celebrate everything they have contributed, they respond that they would rather celebrate everything that Canada has given them. After all, we are looking at two sides of the same coin. Canada owes a lot to its Vietnamese community, which wants to thank Canada. Let us celebrate together.
The proposed new national day would commemorate a major historic event. On January 1, 1975, some 1,500 persons of Vietnamese ancestry were living in Canada, mostly in Quebec. Following the 1979 to 1982 boat people crisis, some 59,000 Vietnamese refugees entered Canada. According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, after the United States, Canada is the country that welcomed the largest number of Vietnamese refugees from 1975 to 1996.
In 1986, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees awarded the Nansen Refugee Award to the people of Canada for the “major and sustained contribution of the People of Canada to the cause of refugees”. Canadians were the first and the only people to have been honoured collectively with this award.
The journey to freedom day will remind us that Canada welcomed tens of thousands of Vietnamese refugees and that Canada must continue to be welcoming. There were millions of victims of the Vietnam War, and unimaginable atrocities were committed on all sides. Since we did not participate, our country could have chosen to ignore these victims. If we are being honest, there were some people in Canada who did not want to get involved in the aftermath and consequences of a conflict we had no part in.
However, Canada remembered that although it was not involved in the war, it played an active role in the peace efforts. Canada remembered that every time it has shown generosity, it has become even stronger. Canada listened to its heart and welcomed refugees not only from Vietnam, but also from Cambodia and Laos, saving many lives and transforming broken dreams into renewed hope.
We must never forget the pain of the exodus, those who lost their lives, the unspeakable horrors experienced by the boat people, or the generosity of the Canadian families, communities and religious groups who took them in, clothed and housed them. Nor must we forget the foresight of the Canadian governments of the day, how hard the newcomers worked to learn, in a matter of months, French, English and new customs or how very much Canada benefited from the contributions of these newcomers, their children and the generations that came after them.
That is what we must never forget. That is what we will all be able to celebrate together in harmony, as we bear in mind both the sacrifices people made and the promises of the future, the opportunities available in a Canada that is stronger because of its Vietnamese community. That is how I, as Liberal critic for Canadian heritage, see this commemoration. That is why I support this bill. There is no other reason. The goal is to bring people together, to leave nobody out. The goal is also to strengthen the bond between Canada and Vietnam, to strengthen the trade, cultural and scientific ties between our two countries. Canada must stand up for human rights and justice in Vietnam as it does all over the world.
In other words, the Liberal Party sees this bill as an opportunity to recognize and celebrate the great contributions of the Vietnamese Canadian people to Canada’s diversity and multiculturalism, and to all the elements of Canadian life and society.
The proposed new national day would also celebrate the Canadian families, charities, religious groups and non-governmental organizations that sponsored tens of thousands of Vietnamese refugees and assisted them in their resettlement and adjustment to their new country.
Some Vietnamese Canadians have written to us, their parliamentarians, to tell us that they do not like the date chosen for the commemoration, April 30; others do not like the title; still others are afraid this commemoration will lead to a historical interpretation that makes them uncomfortable. To that I say that it is important for the people of the Vietnamese community to talk to each other. This commemoration must not be a divisive issue. On the contrary, it should be a symbol of unity and the wonderful symbiosis that exists between the Canadian and Vietnamese identities. That is why I think the committee that looks at this bill must take the time needed to listen to all points of view. In the meantime, Vietnamese Canadians must continue talking to each other to reconcile their points of view.
The Liberal Party of Canada will insist that it is the government’s responsibility to invite an inclusive and comprehensive list of witnesses and experts to discuss this bill at committee to ensure a thorough discussion on the title, date, content and implications of the act.
We, as Canadian parliamentarians, need to clearly understand and send a message that, above all, our intention with this bill is not to dictate an official, unilateral version of the history of another country. We cannot even do that when it comes to Canada. It is not a question of siding with one side or the other after the fact, after a long and bloody war that our country consciously chose not to take part in. No, it is simply a matter of providing an opportunity for us to celebrate the contribution made by Vietnamese Canadians to Canada’s rich social fabric, to remember where we come from in order to better understand where we want to go together.
The daily Le Droit of March 17, 2015 published an article in which I prove, based on the numbers, that the Conservative government has no real plan to deal with Canada’s official languages and linguistic duality. Below is a more complete version which includes a table showing the numbers.
As usual, please do not hesitate to leave a comment!
Enjoy your read.
The Conservative Plan for Linguistic Duality:
Roadmap or Smokescreen?
Liberal Critic for Official Languages
Member of Parliament for Saint-Laurent – Cartierville
In this Month of the Francophonie, it is appropriate to question whether or not the Government of Canada still has an action plan for Canada’s linguistic duality. The government claims it does, and calls it a “roadmap”. But in fact, I am convinced that this is nothing but a sham, a dress window to make us believe the government is doing a lot, a smokescreen to hide government cutbacks.
Don’t take me at my word: an objective look at the numbers says it all. The original action plan, which ran from 2003 to 2008, included precise and measurable objectives (even today, official language communities are kind enough to call it The Dion Plan). To support these objectives, the Plan also included a budget of 751 million dollars over five years. That was real new money, meant to supplement existing programme funds.
On page 26 of the plan, we can read that for education, “$381.5 million are added to the existing funding of $929 million over five years.” Funding for the plan grew year after year.
Once in power, the Conservatives lost sight of these overall objectives. So what we have now is a hodge-podge of vague, targetless, visionless programs. And no new money.
The Conservatives kept funding more or less to the level reached by the Liberal plan in its fifth year. In so doing, they created the illusion that they were more generous, touting a five-year, $1.109 billion plan as opposed to $751 million for the previous plan. The Conservatives’ braggadocio does not hold water: those funds came from pre-existing departmental budgets.
The Table below shows the main consequence of this stagnation.
Annual Sums Transferred to the Provinces and Territories
for Minority Language and Second Language Teaching
|Protocols||Annual Sums Transferred to the Provinces and Territories|
|2007-2008*||$258 597 000|
|2009 à 2012**||$258 597 000|
|2013 à 2018***||$259 558 277|
* Last year of the Liberal Action Plan for Official Languages
** See p.9 of the Protocol for Agreements on Minority-Language Education and Second-Language Instruction for 2009-2010 to 2012-2013
*** See p.9 of the Protocol for Agreements on Minority-Language Education and Second-Language Instruction for 2013-2014 to 2017-2018
It is plain to see that between the last year of the Liberal Action Plan (2008) and the following, Conservative-negotiated period, the total budget allocated to the Provinces and Territories under the Protocol for Agreements on Minority-Language Education and Second-Language Instruction grew by… 0 percent! And that in the next phase (2013-2018), it grew by… less than 0.4 percent! So in 2018, these Conservative roadmaps will grant the Provinces more or less what they got in 2007, in current dollars and without taking inflation into account!
Hiding behind the smokescreen of a roadmap funded by recycled money, the Conservative government cut the other departmental programs devoted to official languages. Official language communities are suffering all the more given that being minorities, they cannot use economies of scale to offset the cuts as much as the majority can.
I am not saying that $750 million should be added every five years to the federal budget for official languages. What I am saying is that a so-called roadmap with no vision, no comprehensive plan and no new money is nothing but smoke and mirrors.
Dear Readers, On March 9, 2015, I once again asked the Harper governement why it had broken its promise not to cut the CBC – Radio-Canada […]
Dear Readers, On February 25, 2015, the House of Commons voted at third reading for Bill C-586, Conservative MP Michael Chong’s Democratic Reform Bill. I was […]
Dear all, On February 17, 2015 at Question period, I questioned the governement on two totally different issues. I first asked the governement why it still […]
Dear Readers, On February 28, 2015, the daily L’Acadie Nouvelle published my short response to NDP MP Yvon Godin’s critique of my text on Official Languages, […]
Dear all On February 24, 2015, as Liberal Critic for Canadian Heritage, I delivered a speech in support of a motion celebrating the famous Stratford Shakespeare Festival. […]
Ottawa – area Liberal MPs and candidates call on the government to reconsider the location of the Memorial to the Victims of Communism February 26, 2015 […]
Dear Readers, Below is the speech on medically assisted dying I delivered in the House of Commons on February 24, 2015, in support of a motion tabled […]